On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 09:19:43PM +0300, Michael Sobolev wrote: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 10:57:02PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote: > > What is the objection to one account per translation team? > It makes difficult to trace the changes. Using only one account per team makes > the team coordinator to create her own cvs server where all changes would be > traced. This seems to add an unneeded work as there is already infrastructure > that aims to do the same thing. > > To my mind, it's team coordinator who should ask for a new account in main cvs > server, request for an account to be removed/disabled/maintained, and trace how > the team members work on the translation. > > So my question would be: > > What is the objection to many accounts per translation team? The Webmaster leader has to track the accounts, make sure they're active, activate accounts as people join translation teams, deactivate them when they leave... What happens when the translation coordinator "just drops out"? I'd like to hear from some of the teams that are already under the "one password" CVS system. -- Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. ========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <gecko@benham.net> <>< * * -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------* * Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster * * <gecko@debian.org> <secretary@debian.org> <lintian-maint@debian.org> * * <webmaster@debian.org> <gecko@fortunet.com> <webmaster@spi-inc.org> * =========================================================================
Attachment:
pgpP5F0_QjDqi.pgp
Description: PGP signature