Quoting Tássia Camões (tassia@gmail.com): > Just some questions about the table for coordinating the job... > It is not clear to me how we are expected to update "number of > reports". Is it the number of people who have reported spams? > shouldn't it be "number of reporters" per month? The number is the number of people who have processed the said month/year. It should indeed be equal to the number of names in the next column > Past years are not separated by month, may I assume that those people > have checked all months for those years? Should we leave it like this > or consider month by month? I left this by year because it would have been a really long list. Also, as the list doesn't have a very high traffic, it is quite easy to process an entire year in a few dozens of minutes (maybe only the first 2-3 years are a little bit longer because of their higher traffic).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature