Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> writes: > Hi, > > Le 16/08/2017 à 19:26, Philip Hands a écrit : >> Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> writes: >>> * URL : https://github.com/component/is-module >> >> That URL is not correct. >> >> Did you perhaps mean: https://github.com/timaschew/is-module >> > > It's annoying: > https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-module > points to: > https://github.com/component/is-module > so what I packaged is what people using npm to get their javascript > chunk actually use. But indeed, that link is a 404. > > The link you point to gives the same license with the same copyright, > but it doesn't look like it's the same author, so I don't know what > I'm supposed to do. Sorry, I've no idea -- the link I came up with is just the result of putting 'is-module' into github's search -- I have no information about how that might relate to whatever was at the other link, or why it's not there now. I do note that timaschew's version includes a comment: // no idea what these regular expressions do, ... ( https://github.com/timaschew/is-module/blob/master/index.js#L2 ) which strikes me as a little worrying, given that the regular expressions constitute pretty-much everything that this package does, so if you can find a version of this by someone that knows what they are doing, that might be a bonus ;-) I guess that the way to make that better would be to get the person responsible for the original version of the regexps to factor that bit out into a separate library, and then rely on that in their code, at which point you'd have a maintained version of the regexps to use, but I can understand that that might not be the path of least resistance. Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd. |-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/ |(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature