Bug#283994: marked as done (ITP: glastree -- builds live backup trees, with branches for each day)
Your message dated Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:14:27 -0500
with message-id <20050103141427.GN761@frogcircus.org>
and subject line close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2004 20:04:17 +0000
>From cfry@ece.cmu.edu Thu Dec 02 12:04:17 2004
Return-path: <cfry@ece.cmu.edu>
Received: from bache.ece.cmu.edu [128.2.129.23]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CZxBY-0002IG-00; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 12:04:17 -0800
Received: from berlin.pdl.cmu.edu (BERLIN.PDL.CMU.EDU [128.2.134.111])
by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B2B937B; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:04:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cfry by berlin.pdl.cmu.edu with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CZxBX-0002lo-4x; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 15:04:15 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Charles Fry <debian@frogcircus.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: glastree -- builds live backup trees, with branches for each day
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 15:04:15 -0500
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <E1CZxBX-0002lo-4x@berlin.pdl.cmu.edu>
Sender: Charles Fry <cfry@ece.cmu.edu>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : glastree
Version : 1.03
Upstream Author : Jeremy Wohl <jeremyw-glastree@igmus.org>
* URL : http://igmus.org/code/
* License : public domain
Description : builds live backup trees, with branches for each day
The poor man's daily snapshot, glastree builds live backup trees, with
branches for each day. Users directly browse the past to recover older
documents or retrieve lost files. Hard links serve to compress out
unchanged files, while modified ones are copied verbatim. A prune
utility effects a constant, sliding window. Similar to pdumpfs; inspired
by Plan9.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (90, 'testing'), (80, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 283994-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jan 2005 14:25:37 +0000
>From cfry@frogcircus.org Mon Jan 03 06:25:37 2005
Return-path: <cfry@frogcircus.org>
Received: from (frogcircus.org) [65.98.66.153]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ClT9N-0002Jy-00; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 06:25:37 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
(uid 1000)
by frogcircus.org with local; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:14:27 -0500
id 0002814B.41D95343.000070EF
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:14:27 -0500
From: Charles Fry <debian@frogcircus.org>
To: 283994-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: close
Message-ID: <20050103141427.GN761@frogcircus.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Linux frogcircus.org 2.4.26-1um
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 283994-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
You guys are right. There don't seem to be any compeling reasons to
provide this package.
Reply to: