On 20/03/15 at 20:02 +0000, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:56:23PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > > also sprach Neil McGovern <neilm@debian.org> [2015-03-20 19:27 +0100]: > > > I'd be more sympathetic to funding someone (perhaps via an > > > internship, or gap year student who's going on to accountancy) to > > > help set up a system so we can track it easier, but only if we > > > woudn't be wasting their time with them simply pinging TOs for > > > data, and not getting replies. > > > > Let's assume they'd be wasting time pinging TOs for data and not > > getting replies. What would you do in that case? > > > > If a TO can't give us useful data about income and expenditure in a > timely manner, that's not acceptible. We should drop the TO unless > improvements happen. As it has been mentioned before, SPI has been struggling with that for a long time now (since before my terms). Does the above mean that, if elected, you will drop SPI from our TO? Which other TO would you then use to keep our funds in dollars? What about non-monetary assets? Lucas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature