[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GR proposal: code of conduct



I second Wouter's proposal and both of Neil's amendments below.
(I haven't counted the current seconds for the amendments. The -vote
page indicates there's not enough.)

On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:05:45PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 05:53:48PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Seconded, but I'd also like a couple of amendments which I'll add in
> > another mail.
> > 
> 
> And here's those amendments.
> 
> Amendment A - move mailing list CoC text to "further reading"
> Justification: I think that it's better to keep the CoC as a general
> purpose document, rather than have it specific to each medium. The
> information at http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct is
> still useful as it stands.
> 
> I'm hopeful Wouter will accept this one, as I don't think it
> substantially changes the CoC.
> 
> ---------
>     participants to its mailinglists, IRC channels, and other modes of
>     communication within the project.
>  
> -2. The initial text of this code of conduct replaces the "mailinglist
> -   code of conduct" at http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
> -
> -3. Updates to this code of conduct should be made by the DPL or the
> +2. Updates to this code of conduct should be made by the DPL or the
>     DPL's delegates after consultation with the project, or by the Debian
>     Developers as a whole through the general resolution procedure.
>  
> -4. The initial text of the code of conduct follows, in markdown format.
> +3. The initial text of the code of conduct follows, in markdown format.
>  
>  # Debian Code of Conduct
>  
> [snip]
>  - Debian has a [diversity statement](http://www.debian.org/intro/diversity)
>  - The [Debian Community Guidelines](http://people.debian.org/~enrico/dcg/)
>    by Enrico Zini contain some advice on how to communicate effectively.
> +- The [Mailing list code of
> +  conduct](http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct) is useful for
> +  advice specific to Debian mailing lists
> ---------
> 
> 
> Amendment B - Updates to the CoC should be via developers as a whole
> Justification - I believe that this document should have the strength of
> being a whole project statement. Being able to be updated by a single
> person doesn't feel comfortable with me.
> 
> I'm less convinced Wouter will accept this, but I think it should be on
> the ballot!
> 
> ---------
>  2. The initial text of this code of conduct replaces the "mailinglist
>     code of conduct" at http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
>  
> -3. Updates to this code of conduct should be made by the DPL or the
> -   DPL's delegates after consultation with the project, or by the Debian
> -   Developers as a whole through the general resolution procedure.
> -
> -4. The initial text of the code of conduct follows, in markdown format.
> +3. The initial text of the code of conduct follows, in markdown format.
>  
>  # Debian Code of Conduct
> ---------
> 
> Thanks!
> Neil
> -- 



-- 
http://www.cafepress.com/trunktees -- geeky funny T-shirts
http://gtdfh.branchable.com/ -- GTD for hackers

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: