Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems"):
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 02:50:00PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > That doesn't contradict the GR.  If the GR passes we have two
> > resolutions:
> > 
> >  11th Feb as modified by GR: sysvinit as default, loose coupling
> >  28th Feb "we choose not to pass a resolution at the current time
> >            [ie on the 28th of February] about coupling"
> > 
> > These are not contradictory.  In particular, the 28th of February
> > resolution should not be read as vacating the 11th of February
> > resolution's GR rider, which is what you are suggesting.
> 
> I'm not disagreeing that you're allowed to do it, I'm disagreeing
> that it's a good idea to do it.

Does that mean that you are now tending towards the view that
Matthew's proposal requires only a simple 1:1 majority ?

Ian.