[second try, this with mutt instead of tin] In article <email@example.com> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote: [...] > PROPOSAL START > ======================================================================== > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements > to initiate one are too small. > Therefore the Debian project resolves that > a) The constitution gets changed to not require K developers to sponsor > a resolution, but floor(2Q). [see §4.2(1)] > b) Delaying a decision of a Delegate or the DPL [§4.2(2.2)], > as well as resolutions against a shortening of discussion/voting > period or to overwrite a TC decision [§4.2(2.3)] requires floor(Q) > developers to sponsor the resolution. > c) the definition of K gets erased from the constitution. [§4.2(7)] > (Numbers in brackets are references to sections in the constitution). > ======================================================================== > PROPOSAL END [...] seconded. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
Description: Digital signature