Re: GR Proposal: GFDL statement
* Anthony Towns:
> Bcc'ed to -project, -legal and -private; followups to -vote please.
>
> It's been six months since the social contract changes that forbid
> non-free documentation went into effect [0], and we're still distributing
> GFDLed stuff in unstable [1]. I think we should get serious about fixing
> that, and as part of that that we should release the following statement
> (or one like it) on the GFDL:
This GR effectively overrides decisions by the DPL and his delegates,
and should mention this.
Apart from that, I've mixed feelings about it. I don't know what's
really going on behind the scenes.
Reply to: