[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge



On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 04:02:47PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:43:05AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 20:22:27 +1000, Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> said: 
> > > Perhaps for our next GR, we can contemplate whether it's appropriate
> > > that less than 20% of the developers is enough to change one of our
> > > most important documents. In fact, it could have been changed with
> > > as few as 35, being less than 4%. That is, a 3:1 majority of
> > > quorum(45.274).  That's a very uncomfortable feeling.
> > 
> > 	That is bot, BTW, how quorum works.  You would need at least
> >  46 people to change the foundation documents, as long as they were of
> >  one mind.
> 
> No, you need 46 people and only three quarters of them need agree.
> That is less than 4% of our developer community.

That's a mischaracterisation. You also need *all* the other developers
to be absent or apathetic. If that were the case then there's a great
deal of dead weight, and it would indeed be reasonable to pass the
change without them.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: