Re: "keep non-free" proposal

[Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>]

On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:07:33AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-03-09 06:07:36 +0000 Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> 
> wrote:
> 
> >I would gladly have seen a ballot of the like of :
> >   A) drop non-free, do not create non-free.org, stop any relationship
> >   with non-free related .debs.
> >
> >   B) drop non-free and create non-free.org
> 
> Would a GR that tried to compel actions by other groups be valid? Is 
> this GR trying to commit the project to producing non-free.org?

Well, this is the actual drop non-free option, the A) would carry more
restrictions, but this one is naturally, dependent on someone creating
non-free.org to move stuff too.

> >   C) keep non-free, but take a more active hand in examining and
> >   removing stuff from non-free. [snip!]
> 
> Too vague. I tried to discuss this sort of option with you in January, 
> but you weren't really willing (see my email in a few seconds). I'm 
> sorry that no-one thought it important enough to form into something 
> on this ballot for you, but you could have done that too.

Yeah, it's Raul's fault :)) (no offense meant, raul).

Friendly,

Sven Luther