[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "keep non-free" proposal



On 2004-03-08 12:04:50 +0000 Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:39:43PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
On 2004-03-06 10:20:44 +0000 Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote:

elfutils was removed on the request of its maintainer on 9th December.

elfutils is not an example of removal from non-free. It was in main. I filed bug #221761 after a debian-legal discussion pointed it out.

And ? The fact that it previously was in non-free but is now in main
doesn't count ?

Was it? It's not now in main. The "initial upload" elfutils upload was to main in July 2003 (version 0.84-1). It was removed from main on 9th December (bug 221761). When was it in non-free?

[...] The packages are not more actively
removed, because nobody, including the remove non-free proponent, care
enough about it.

As far as I can tell, Andrew Suffield and others are working as much as they can on reducing non-free through analysing licences and explaining the DFSG in that context. I doubt you have any reason to accuse them of not caring enough.

--
MJR/slef     My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ slef@jabber.at
 Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/



Reply to: