Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 18:20:17 +0100, Joey Hess wrote:
> Markus wrote:
>> Ask in normal Debian or GNU/Linux forums how does a normal Debian OS
>> source.list looks. The main answer will be:
>> deb ftp:... main contrib non-free
>
> Non-free removal or no, this is not true as of sarge.
do you mean the default source.list after installation? Does the sarge
installer also not ask the user if he want to include non-free? Then i
would say it is definitely a step forward.
But i doesn't mean the default source.list in my message above.
I mean something like "I have accidentally deleted my source.list, can you
tell me how a normal Debian GNU/Linux source list looks?" This kind of
question were answered to 99% in Debian or GNU/Linux user forums with
source.list entries which contain contrib and non-free just because for
the most users non-free is part of the Debian OS, as i have explained in
my above message more detailed.
Reply to: