Re: Questions for the candidates
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> [...]
> Do you believe that developers should be (or are) equally willing to have
> a dialogue with people who provide criticism consisting of suggestions
> of alternatives, discussion of tradeoffs that can and should be made
> and helpful bits of code, or people who accompany their complaints with
> comments like "This FUCKING SUCKS! The maintainer must be incompetent or
> on crack" and requests for dismissal or replacement rather than useful
> assistance?
If you want to make a point, that's fine, but please don't abuse
debian-vote and "Questions for the candidates" for this, that just
wastes everybody's time. These are no reasonable questions.
--
Falk
Reply to: