On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:18:10AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:40:18PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > For comparison, from the social contract rewrite I mentioned a while ago,
> > ] We will build a free operating system
> > ] We will create and provide an integrated system of free software that
> > ] anyone can use. We will make all our work publically available as free
> > ] software. We will accept and support the use of the Debian
> > ] distribution by all users for all purposes, without discrimination.
> > -- http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/social_contract.html
> Are you going to propose that as a ballot option?
I don't think it's on point for the question of "should we keep or
remove non-free", and I think that's a much more important issue to
address first. (ie, "no")
OTOH, when we come to cleaning up the social contract properly, I might.
Dunno.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could.
http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature