Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...)
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 04:07:13PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 08:54:32AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> Ah, sure, but see what happened last time this came up.
>
> And it would be hypocrit. The real issue is what do we want to do about
> non-free, not that we want to ammend the social contract. Without
> clarifying our position on this, the social contract GR will probably
> fail, and if it pass, it would be by fooling the voters about the real
> intentions of the GR, like Branden tried to do.
Well, why not have a non-free GR, and add a social contract hostile
amendment, so that people can vote on both at once, and rank their
preferences appropriately?
I see no way that an informal poll has any bearing on who is a
hypocrite, or flushes out the intentions of people that propose things.
-- John
Reply to: