Re: GR: Removal of non-free

[joe@nahmias.net (Joe Nahmias)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Steve Langasek wrote:
> So how about if we go ahead and get this thing moved to a vote, so we
> can all get back to working on the sarge installer?

An excellent idea!  However, although the minimum discussion period has
been exceeded, in the (bit over) two weeks since the GR was proposed
there haven't been enough seconds for it to be called to a vote.  Here
are the posts pertaining to the vote as I have followed them (please
post corrections, the secretary has final discretion, etc...):

1) GR proposed by Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> in
<20031224204311.GA4684@suffields.me.uk> available at
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200312/msg00011.html>

2) GR seconded by Graham Wilson <graham@debian.org> in
<20031224225600.GA474@quux.local> available at
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200312/msg00012.html>

3) GR seconded by Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> in
<20031231201440.GA11133@deadbeast.net> available at
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200312/msg00064.html>

4) GR modified by Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> in
<20031229204125.GA12797@suffields.me.uk> available at
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200312/msg00044.html>

5) GR modification seconded by Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> in
<20031231203629.GD11133@deadbeast.net> available at
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200312/msg00069.html>

So, it would seem that the modified GR still needs four additional
seconds in order to be officially introduced and be eligible to be
called to a vote.


- --Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE//jOHKl23+OYWEqURAhtxAJ9CvdPg2tVJHd3PdLJ2aYu4gDWL+gCghJTN
+qvtqwvObFVoaU9/69Xe6lQ=
=++bZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----