On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 07:00:29PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > =========================================================================== > The Debian project hereby resolves: > > - That the developers in charge for adding the architecture identified by > dpkg as "amd64", hereinafter "amd64", to the "unstable" archive, should > explain publicly (via debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org) the problems > which delay this action. This is a no-op by rule of the constitution. > - That the developers working on the "amd64" port should be invited to > friendly cooperate in solving all of these problems. This is explicitly a no-op. > - That failure to accomplish the above rules implies any existant problems > shall be ignored and hence "amd64" added to the "unstable" archive without > further delay. Another no-op by rule of the constitution. > - That success in accomplishing the above rules has no implication with > regard to inclussion of the "amd64" architecture in a stable release. And another explicit no-op. You cannot write a GR to order somebody to do something. That's fundamental to the project structure, and written into the constitution. Get used to the idea, and stop proposing GRs that don't do anything. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature