On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 06:28:04PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Colin Watson (cjwatson@debian.org) [040720 17:55]: > > I think it is extremely unwise to set a precedent of overriding > > technical decisions for essentially political reasons, and I do not > > think that the release management team should view this pending vote as > > a blocking issue for sarge. > > > > I would like my objections to be registered on the ballot somehow, but I > > don't really have time to put together an amendment. Can anybody help > > here? > > For those interessted in that: I'm currently drafting an amendment, > see http://people.debian.org/~aba/proposal-amd64 for the current > status. What's with the absurd pseudo-EU-government formatting? You realise it's normally used to make documents harder to read, and thereby discourage participation? The stuff before "hereby resolves" should be deleted anyway, and instead posted to a mailing list as normal prose. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature