Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> Read the message you're replying to, where I answered that exact question:
Sorry, but I was looking for more detail. How will we decide whether
a package is "really important to some users"? Who will determine if
this or that package is "pointless"? My question, the one that earned
this snide reply from you, asked for an objective test, and I found
"really important" and "pointless" to be subjective tests. A suitable
proxy for an objective test might be to have a procedure in place for
deciding whether something is pointless or really important.
Thomas
Reply to: