Re: Another proposal.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:45:03PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> But, I still insist that it is still not ok if the system allows an
> insincere vote to hand victory to a non-default option.
Uh, if you're just going to insist on it no matter what, there's
not really much point discussing it with you, is there? I think your
insistance on this issue is as wrong and impractical as if you were
trying to violate Arrow's theorem (which I'm not sure you aren't).
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Reply to: