Re: Election status
>>"Drake" == Drake Diedrich <Drake.Diedrich@anu.edu.au> writes:
Drake> Easier for the voter to verify that it's the right md5sum for
Drake> the loginid+vote+token? Otherwise only those intimately
We have actual developers who think taking a md5sum is arcane?
I suppose if a simple command line invocation is too much for one,
one does not really care about ones vote. However, since I shall
never be sure who exactly is going to be that lazy (or incompetent,
if they find md5sum invocations beyond their grasp), so it shall
likely be a deterrent against vote stuffing.
Drake> familiar with the vote encoding are at all likely to verify
Drake> their votes - the author alone most likely.
Author - for a one liner? I think you are caviling at this
proposal, and insulting the vast majority of developers
manoj
--
The man on tops walks a lonely street; the "chain" of command is
often a noose.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: