Re: Q: guidelines for post-campaign period?
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:14:11 +0100, Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> said:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 11:34:45AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
>> Could I ask why you "not generating new material" during the voting
>> period is a good thing?
> Because, obviously, people who already voted would have to check
> every day to see whether some new twist in the campaign has arisen
> that would lead to a change in their opinion.
Speaking for myself, I would place a much higher premium on
the ability to change ones mind given fresh information, rather than
having my vote be writ in stone. If there is new information that
would change my mind, I would rather I had an opportunity to act on
this new information, rather than be ignorant and learn about it
after the fact.
I prefer to be informed on the issues, rather than be ignorant
and be proud of sticking to an erroneous decision.
manoj
speaking for himself, and not in any official capacity
--
Does biff in bo work coz it biffin doesn't beep an if biff in bo is
broke then biff in bo I will delete I've tried biff in bo with 'y'
I've tried biff in bo with '-y' no biffin output does it show so poor
wee biff is gonna go. John Spence <jspence@lynx.net.au> on debian-user
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: