Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> Sure they do:
>
> 4. Overrule a Developer (requires a 3:1 majority).
> The Technical Committee may ask a Developer to take a particular
> technical course of action even if the Developer does not wish to;
> this requires a 3:1 majority. For example, the Committee may
> determine that a complaint made by the submitter of a bug is
> justified and that the submitter's proposed solution should be
> implemented.
My reading of that has been that this is limited to actual technical
matters (such as those in 6.1-2 of the Constitution). But on
re-reading the text, while I would still say this, I agree that my
reading is by no means the only one of the text.
So, Technical Committee, what say you? Would you entertain such
requests?
Reply to: