Yeah, they care only about licencing, and conflictive relationship withupstream, not about
Just looking at very recent past, debian-legal contributors have had constructive discussions with people from the JasPer, Mozilla and Cryptlib projects and the Text Encoding Initiative. We've had poor exchanges with X-Oz and XFree86, but that's not entirely one-sided. A discussion with FSF is continuing with little way to judge the development at preset, but other discussions (not about FDL) are still pleasant and productive.
And i am sure with all the time lost in this thread, at least onenon-free software could have been fully reimplemented from scratch in afree way, don't you think ?
Probably, but I type fast, so my emails don't lose much time. You challenge every single post, often with errors and wild assertions. Look at the start of this exchange: I pointed out that elfutils was removed from main, not non-free. Very short and there was no error in it. You replied with some bizarre (and incorrect AFAICT) statement about elfutils being in non-free and added random accusations about that showing how nobody cares enough about removing non-free. If you want people to stop correcting and challenging you, stop posting so many obvious errors and unjustified claims.
-- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ slef@jabber.at Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/