Hi, Raul Miller: > > (Ah, assertions without examples. How helpful.) > > [ Example ] > c wins > c would win without any supermajority rule, so there's no need to remove option A in the first place, so there's no problem. IMHO, option A should only be removed if it would win, but doesn't satisfy its supermajority requirement. > > Define "like Condorcet". > Same outcome as Condorcet for the same votes. > Note that _any_ Condorcet conflict resolution algorithm has a "problem" with added or removed options. That's not avoidable, so the fact that it happens in some situations is a null argument -- it also happens in some cases where you use superdefeat rules. -- Matthias Urlichs | noris network AG | http://smurf.noris.de/ -- Anything not nailed down is a cat toy.
Attachment:
pgpaC8u6rBHn7.pgp
Description: PGP signature