Re: Status of Proposals [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Disambiguation of 4.1.5
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:12:22AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [ ] yes to a
> [ ] no to a [ ] yes to a AND b
> [ ] yes to b <===> [ ] yes to b alone
> [ ] no to b [ ] further discussion
> [ ] further discussion
>
Would [ ] no to a and b be needed also ?
So that you could vote for none of the changes without further discution (not
that that is what i want ot vote, bt the possibility should be there ...
Friendly,
sven Luther
Reply to: