On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:05:35PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > His remains a strict superset of mine. If you feel I am being dishonest, I > suggest you perform a diff of the actual texts of the proposed changes, > excluding front matter in the mail messages, and the rationales. No, I don't think any dishonesty is involved. Can you clarify for me that: 1. Your proposal allows any nontechnical document defined by 4.1.5 to be modified, without any special majority; 2. Manoj's proposal allows nontechnical documents to be modified; a subset of these, known as foundation documents, require a 3:1 majority to be modified; the others require no special majority. In addition, the list of foundation documents requires a 3:1 majority to modify. Is this a fair summary? thanks, Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Attachment:
pgpWFho1K2kE9.pgp
Description: PGP signature