Re: Should a serious bug have made in into bullseye 11.5?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Should a serious bug have made in into bullseye 11.5?
From: songbird <songbird@anthive.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:39:14 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 2gfbvi-a13.ln1@anthive.com>
Reply-to: songbird <songbird@anthive.com>
References: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.21.2209112111160.2882@einstein.home.woodall.me.uk> <[🔎] 20220912120020.xcgusc4csnjgachj@bitfolk.com> <[🔎] 20220912120852.dbgepfkyhltwmff6@bitfolk.com> <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.21.2209121341250.2882@einstein.home.woodall.me.uk> <[🔎] Yx9L6PmiWchATlDw@axis.corp> <[🔎] Yx9L6PmiWchATlDw@axis.corp> <[🔎] E1oYaYb-006cUI-FU@mail.einval.com>

Steve McIntyre wrote:
...
> I'm building a new unstable package (2.06-4) right now with Valentin's
> patch applied, and once I've uploaded that I'll do a new bullseye
> package too.

  that's great!  thank you!  :)


  songbird

Reply to:

References:
- Should a serious bug have made in into bullseye 11.5?
  - From: Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk>
- Re: Should a serious bug have made in into bullseye 11.5?
  - From: Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>
- Re: Should a serious bug have made in into bullseye 11.5?
  - From: Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>
- Re: Should a serious bug have made in into bullseye 11.5?
  - From: Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk>
- Re: Should a serious bug have made in into bullseye 11.5?
  - From: David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk>
- Re: Should a serious bug have made in into bullseye 11.5?
  - From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>

Prev by Date: Paying Debian contributors (Was Re: Advantages/Disadvantages of Open Source Software)
Next by Date: Re: drive controller Q?
Previous by thread: Re: Should a serious bug have made in into bullseye 11.5?
Next by thread: Printer pauses a few seconds between each page
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread