Re: best way to correct (possibly) outdated information on wiki.debian.org
On Sun 30 Dec 2018 at 16:54:19 +0100, Andrea Borgia wrote:
> Il 30/12/18 16:23, Brian ha scritto:
>
>
> > There is probably no need for an example file now that #889668 is closed.
> > Incidentally - you opened the report, so you can close it; especially if
> > you think it will save someone some work.
>
> Yes, that was my goal.
>
>
> I sent the following text to 916733@bugs.debian.org
>
> -x-x-x-
> Control: close -1
> quit
>
> The examples are probably not needed anymore, now that the files are
> installed by default under /lib/systemd (see bug #732054 and #889668).
> -x-x-x-
>
>
> I got this reply:
> -x-x-x-
> Failed to mark 916733 as done: The 'request_subject' parameter (undef) to
> Debbugs::Control::set_done was an 'undef', which is not one of the allowed
> types: scalar
> -x-x-x-
> (the text has been recorded, however)
I am unfamiliar with the bts (?) method so cannot offer advice.
> Should I write to 916733-done@bugs.debian.org, perhaps?
This is the what I normally use.
--
Brian.
Reply to: