[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Why Debian



Rob Owens wrote at 2013-11-10 12:30 -0600:
> My first permanent Linux distribution (after trying a Knoppix live cd)
> was Mandrake.  When I started using it to rip my music CDs, it defaulted
> to ogg vorbis.  I was expecting mp3.  "What the hell is this ogg
> stuff?", I remember asking myself.  
> 
> I figured out how to switch to mp3 format.  But a seed was planted in my
> head, and I soon learned what ogg was and why it was important.  I
> switched back to ripping to ogg vorbis.  Years later when my wife wanted
> a portable music player, I searched high and low to find one that
> supported ogg vorbis.  There weren't many, but I was determined to "vote
> with my wallet" and not use mp3.  At the time, mp3 was not only
> patent-encumbered, but it sounded much worse than ogg vorbis at the
> bitrates commonly used in that day.
> 
> Years later still, I wanted a portable music player for myself.  It was
> now much easier to find one that supported ogg vorbis (and even flac).
> There were forums of people recommending such players.  I settled on a
> Sandisk Sansa Clip+.  
> 
> My point is that Mandrake's choice of default music format helped to
> educate me.  It pushed me to demand the support of open formats from
> hardware vendors.  Maybe they listened to me, or maybe it was just
> coincidence, but support for open formats in portable music players has
> been increasing since I started using Linux around 2005.  This sure
> feels to me like a win for open standards and user education.
> 
> So when Debian chooses ideals over practicality, it may be rendering
> itself unusable to certain users.  But it is also driving more advanced
> users to explore alternatives to non-free software.  It may be driving
> the
> even more advanced users to *write* alternatives to non-free software.
> This, I believe, is why it is important for Debian not to compromise its
> principles.  

Excellent example!

> Debian *is* the DFSG and the Social Contract.  I use Debian because of
> that.  There are plenty of other operating systems that I could use if I
> cared more about ease of use and less about freedom.  The world is full
> of such systems.  What would be the benefit of adding Debian to that 
> list?  It would become just another OS, as it discards the very things 
> that set it apart from the rest.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: