On Mi, 01 aug 12, 20:23:35, Celejar wrote: > On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 19:45:27 +0300 > Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mi, 01 aug 12, 00:59:29, Yaro Kasear wrote: > > > On 07/31/2012 01:42 PM, Celejar wrote: > > > >On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:30:50 +0300 > > > >Andrei POPESCU<andreimpopescu@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >>On Jo, 19 iul 12, 22:50:25, Celejar wrote: > > > >>>Quite true - and completely irrelevant to my point. I don't deny that > > > >>>money can be made with FLOSS, just that it's pointless to try to sell > > > >>>copies of one's software if it's freely copyable. The examples you give > > > >>>are all of models other than the straightforward sale of licenses or > > > >>>copies. > > > >>IMO a business model that relies on the possibility to sell copies that > > > >>basically cost nothing to produce is broken. > > > >Is this a moral claim, a business one, a legal one, or just plain dogma? > > [The line to which you are responding is mine, not Yaro's.] Yes I know, and I thought the levels of quoting show that, or don't they? Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature