Re: Why have d-community-offtopic? (Re: What does group consider to be "on topic"?)
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:32:14AM +0000, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 23:19:07 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 02:46:43PM +0000, Camaleón wrote:
> >> But I wouldn't post there how to configure an Oracle database with the
> >> current Debian stable. Hope you see the "slightly" difference between a
> >> brocolli and Oracle.
> >
> > Umm, I think so. :) I hope you see Oracle support doesn't come under
> > the "umbrella" of debian-user.
>
> No, of course; it was just an example for a question that can fit here
> tagged with [OT].
But, it **IS** ON TOPIC if they are not looking for Oracle support, so
marking it [OT] is counter productive.
logical conclusion:
d-community-offtopic would be the list to post to if they wanted free
Oracle support.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to: