Re: To pulse or not to pulse?

To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: To pulse or not to pulse?
From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:41:39 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1342626099.1261.85.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] ju6k79$d1g$12@dough.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] CAKmZw+Y=8+3x0bW9m7mqLeghdDdvGpncVkbtLEHMCj6jyxrz-g@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] ju6k79$d1g$12@dough.gmane.org>

On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 15:20 +0000, Camaleón wrote:
> I'm very happy with the old ESD

And you can be happy for good reasons!
However, IIRC for KDE it was aRts and it never caused issues for my jack
orientated workflow and pro-audio cards.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: To pulse or not to pulse?
  - From: Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com>

References:
- To pulse or not to pulse?
  - From: Brad Alexander <storm16@gmail.com>
- Re: To pulse or not to pulse?
  - From: Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: text size on CLI
Next by Date: Re: I'm having way too much trouble mounting my blackberry SDCARD
Previous by thread: Re: To pulse or not to pulse?
Next by thread: Re: To pulse or not to pulse?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread