Re: ACPI Menagement
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 15:55 +0000, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 08 May 2012 22:46:13 +0200, ricccardo wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Ricardo. Please, post at the bottom.
>
> > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 17:32 +0000, Camaleón wrote:
> >> On Tue, 08 May 2012 00:02:40 +0200, ricccardo wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'm a newbie of Debian; I use Debian 6 with a macbook pro and I would
> >> > like to improve the durability of the battery. So I installed
> >> > powertop (1.11) but a message says: no ACPI power usage estimate
> >> > available. How can solve this??
> >>
> >> Google suggests that you have to unplug the power cord to get the
> >> estimations.
>
> Ricardo, are you running the "powertop" command whith the power cord
> removed?
>
> >> > From synaptic I see I have installed only the following package:
> >> > acpi; acpi-support-base; acpid.
> >> > Which other packages should I install??
> >>
> >> Run "acpi -V" and put here the output.
>
> > ric@ricmbp:~$ acpi -V
> > Battery 0: Discharging, 92%, 01:24:54 remaining
> > Battery 0: design capacity 4721 mAh, last full capacity 3314 mAh = 70%
> > Adapter 0: off-line
> > Cooling 0: Processor 0 of 10
> > Cooling 1: Processor 0 of 10
>
> And is the above data right? I mean, does it coincide with the battery
> information the power applet displays?
>
> Greetings,
>
> --
> Camaleón
>
>
Hi, the information are obtained with the power chord unplugged. I
notice that the result of "powertop" and "apci -V" are different.
ric@ricmbp:~$ acpi -V
Battery 0: Discharging, 75%, 01:04:08 remaining
Battery 0: design capacity 4851 mAh, last full capacity 3520 mAh = 72%
Adapter 0: off-line
Cooling 0: Processor 0 of 10
Cooling 1: Processor 0 of 10
ric@ricmbp:~$ sudo powertop
PowerTOP 1.11 (C) 2007, 2008 Intel Corporation
Power usage (ACPI estimate): 315.8W (0.1 hours)
The two results seems to be different.
Furthermore, the battery information displayed by the power applet
sometimes are divergent from the results of the "apci -V". I mean the
battery indicator is red (about 4%) but "apci" says 66%.....
Best
Riccardo
Reply to: