Re: [OT] Re: unsuscribe
>>>>> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> writes:
>>>>> On Qui, 01 Set 2011, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>> This one didn't (here).
>> Is there any concensus on what/how/when these footers are added? It
>> seems quite random to me.
> That message was GPG-signed, the footer is not added because it would
> break the signature. (Actually, it was added to another part of the
> multi-part message, but I could only see that by looking at the
> message source.)
> I believe HTML mails also do not get the footer (or something along
> the same lines is done).
Curiously enough, the message I'm replying to [1] didn't have
the footer, either. (I'm looking at it as raw text, so MIME
doesn't matter.)
However, its Content-Type: is:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes
Which, I guess, is to be blamed for that, thanks to “DelSp=Yes”.
Seemingly, the mailing list software only adds the footer for
the single-part messages whose Content-Type: it recognizes.
[1] [🔎] 20110901150151.Horde.x0w0JMm_qOVOX8iP2ktQy4A@mail.kalinowski.com.br">news:[🔎] 20110901150151.Horde.x0w0JMm_qOVOX8iP2ktQy4A@mail.kalinowski.com.br
--
FSF associate member #7257 Coming soon: Software Freedom Day
http://mail.sf-day.org/lists/listinfo/ planning-ru (ru), sfd-discuss (en)
Reply to: