[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Efficient remotely backed, locally encrypted block devices?



Christian Jaeger wrote at 2011-09-21 22:34 -0500:
> Before I'm seriously starting to think about starting to code
> anywhere, I'd like to know what best to do. Is there another good
> solution?

You might want to look at bup and obnam, though they probably both prioritize 
bandwidth efficiency more than storage server processor usage.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: