Re: wicd
On 2011-08-03 15:05:34 -0400, Robert Blair Mason Jr. wrote:
> It would be a very nice feature, but I would be willing to bet money
> it's an order of magnitude more complicated to implement than it should
> be (it's hardware, after all), and the developer hours are probably
> better spent elsewhere, IMHO.
It shouldn't be hard as all the information is in the kernel logs.
For instance:
Jul 24 22:00:11 xvii kernel: [565823.481727] iwlagn 0000:0c:00.0: RF_KILL bit toggled to disable radio.
Jul 24 22:00:43 xvii kernel: [565858.857570] iwlagn 0000:0c:00.0: RF_KILL bit toggled to enable radio.
Since the kernel knows the status of the radio button, the applications
should be able to know it too.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: wicd
- From: Mark Grieveson <dg135@torfree.net>
- Re: wicd
- From: Charlie <ariestao@skymesh.com.au>
- Re: wicd
- From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>
- Re: wicd
- From: "Robert Blair Mason Jr." <rbmj@verizon.net>