In <[🔎] 20110124202335.GA5477@hysteria.proulx.com>, Bob Proulx wrote: >In another thread: >Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> ... Apache (from upstream) has supported it for a while and I've had >> it in production (system based on Ubuntu Maverick) for a number of >> months. > >Re: NameVirtualHost *:443 > >This is good to hear but if so then how do they pull that off? I >thought for https that the certificate negotiation was tied to the IP >address? No? Is there a way to have all of the browsers use starttls >for https and to be able to share virtual hosts with SSL on a single >IP address? That would be awesome! Where can I read about it? It is >a feature that I have wanted for a very long time. http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/NameBasedSSLVHostsWithSNI I believe Lenny does actually have a recent enough version of both apache2 and libssl0.9.8, but I've not tried using SNI with Lenny's version of Apache. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.