peasthope@shaw.ca wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > You have a complicated setup! > > A complex setup. "complicated" is a verb. ... Sorry. Uhm... No. Complicated is an adjective. From WordNet (r) 2.0 [wn]: complicated adj : difficult to analyze or understand; "a complicated problem"; "complicated Middle East politics" > It's simplifying slowly and surely. One helpful detail is to > route to a LAN rather than to individual machines. > route 172.23.0.0 255.255.0.0 > rather than > # Curie > route 172.23.4.2 > # Heaviside > route 172.23.5.2 Yes. Definitely yes. Simpler is better. > > But since you have routes to public IP space there perhaps you would > > want to route all of your traffic over the vpn (once you have it > > working) and then you wouldn't need specific routes for everything. > > Dalton has a relatively fast connection to the 'net > provided by the university. Joule at home has a > relatively slow connection to the net through shaw.ca. > > Are you suggesting that all of dalton's 'net traffic > go through the tunnel and Joule? Are you suggesting > that all of joule's 'net traffic go through the tunnel > and dalton? Aren't both significantly disadvantageous? I am suggesting that you have such a complicated routing setup that it is causing you difficulty and that you should simplify it by some method. You listed five (5!) route commands in your configuration. >>> # Machines in the local home zone reached _via_ the tunnel. >>> # Curie >>> route 172.23.4.2 >>> # Heaviside >>> route 172.23.5.2 >>> # Shaw mail servers _via_ the tunnel. >>> # route shawmail.gv.shawcable.net >>> route 64.59.128.135 >>> route 24.71.223.43 >>> # Shaw ftp server _via_ the tunnel. >>> # route ftp.shaw.ca >>> route 64.59.128.134 And you have been having such trouble with your vpn(s). To me that is like a house of cards. A light breeze blows it over. In order to be more robust it needs to be simpler, less rigid, and more flexible. > > Standard email headers apply. RFC 2822 would cover them. > > Certainly, but how many new Debian users will find RFC 2822, study > it and perceive how threading works when subscribing to debian-user? But you asked the question! :-) It isn't fair to ask a question, get an answer, and then complain about it. :-) That is dirty dealing! In response I will only say that most users will simply use an MUA (mail user agent) and will simply use it (mutt, thunderbird, gmail, whatever) to generate follow-ups. It is the MUA's job to do the right thing with respect to email headers. Let's hope the author of the MUA actually took the time to read the RFCs. Bob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature