Re: Tomcat is only listening with ip6 and not ip4
I think it's related to discussion in debian-devel:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> wrote:
> I am proposing to set net.ipv6.bindv6only=1 by default for new
> installations, to simplify configuration and administration of systems
> using IPv6 and to make the system behaviour match the one of all other
> operating systems, which default to this or just do not provide a
> choice.
>
> When net.ipv6.bindv6only is set to 0, an application binding an
> AF_INET6 listening socket to "any" will receive on the same socket IPv4
> connections as well, with the endpoint addresses converted in the form
> ::ffff:1.2.3.4[1].
>
> When net.ipv6.bindv6only is set to 1, an application binding an
> AF_INET6 listening socket to "any" will only receive IPv6 connection and
> will need to create an AF_INET listening socket to receive IPv4
> connections.
>
> Applications can change the behaviour for their sockets using setsockopt
> and the IPV6_V6ONLY option[2], and many already do this to prevent the
> need of adjusting their configuration depending on how the system is
> configured.
>
> More information is also available in[3].
>
> While net.ipv6.bindv6only=0 is useful for daemons which are not designed
> to listen on multiple sockets, it is annoying because it requires
> dealing with IPv4-mapped addresses in logs and configuration files
> unless the program takes care to convert them to IPv4 addresses.
>
> I propose that netbase will create on new installations a file in
> /etc/sysctl.d/ containing net.ipv6.bindv6only=1.
>
>
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6#IPv4_mapped_addresses
>
> [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3493#section-5.3
>
> [3] http://books.google.com/books?id=UuIqKlWVaKcC&lpg=PA118&ots=2XZWUqI0au&pg=PA118#v=onepage
>
> --
> ciao,
> Marco
>
Thus you should report a bug against Tomcat. Also you can replace
"net.ipv6.bindv6only=1" with "net.ipv6.bindv6only=0" in your
/etc/sysctl.d/ as a temporary solution.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Alan Chandler
<alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk> wrote:
> Alan Chandler wrote:
>>
>> I have just upgraded my server from lenny to unstable and I now find a
>> tomcat application server backed has stopped working (front end on another
>> machine has the jk_mod installed and links through using ajp on port 8009).
>>
>> Using netstat --listening on the tomcat machine I find that tomcat is only
>> listening with the ip6 protocol and not ip4. Net result it has stopped
>> working.
>>
>> I haven't changed anything during the upgrade, and I can't see anywhere
>> where it is defined what protocols tomcat is listening (at least there
>> doesn't appear to be anything in server.xml).
>>
>> How can I fix this so that tomcat listens using ip4 and not ip6?
>>
>
>
> Netstat output
>
> owl:/var/log/tomcat5.5# netstat --listening
> Active Internet connections (only servers)
> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
> tcp 0 0 *:rsync *:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 localhost:mysql *:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 *:6543 *:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 *:6544 *:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 *:ssh *:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 localhost:ipp *:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 localhost:postgresql *:* LISTEN
> tcp6 0 0 [::]:8009 [::]:* LISTEN
> tcp6 0 0 [::]:rsync [::]:* LISTEN
> tcp6 0 0 [::]:www [::]:* LISTEN
> tcp6 0 0 [::]:auth [::]:* LISTEN
> tcp6 0 0 [::]:8180 [::]:* LISTEN
> tcp6 0 0 [::]:ssh [::]:* LISTEN
> tcp6 0 0 localhost:ipp [::]:* LISTEN
> tcp6 0 0 localhost:postgresql [::]:* LISTEN
> tcp6 0 0 [::]:https [::]:* LISTEN
> udp 0 0 *:mdns *:*
> udp 0 0 255.255.255.255:1900 *:*
> udp 0 0 239.255.255.250:1900 *:*
> udp 0 0 *:ipp *:*
> udp 0 0 *:ntp *:*
> udp 0 0 *:33154 *:*
> udp 0 0 *:6549 *:*
> udp 0 0 *:323 *:*
> udp 0 0 *:bootpc *:*
> udp6 0 0 [::]:40262 [::]:*
> udp6 0 0 [::]:mdns [::]:*
>
>
> The strange thing here is that apache is listening only on the ip6 port 80,
> but it is seeing requests from my browser
>
> --
> Alan Chandler
> http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject
> of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Reply to: