[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Stop Ahead (was top posting)



On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:34:28PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:06:33PM +1000, Julian De Marchi wrote:
> > <snip>
> >
> >> Only if the lines are also reversed, kind of like how STOP AHEAD is
> >> painted on pavement with the word STOP first, then AHEAD after so you
> >> pass over the first word in the statement before the second.
> >>
> >
> > Well put! :-)
> 
> continuing to veer wildly off-topic.
> 
> I always hated that STOP AHEAD thing. I always figured if you are
> close enough to the words that it mattered which one you drove over
> first, you aren't looking far enough up the road. And if you are
> following too closely to read it all at once, then you are following
> too closely. There's probably a reason I'm not a traffic engineer.
my thoughts as well
> 
> A



-- 
"For every fatal shooting, there were roughly three non-fatal shootings. And, folks, this is unacceptable in America. It's just unacceptable. And we're going to do something about it. "

	- George W. Bush
05/14/2001
Philadelphia, PA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: