On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:57:18PM +0000, Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 06:13:57PM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:54:52PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 04:26:38PM +0100, Misko wrote: > > > > > > > Just now I found new way to read Michael's emails: > > > > first pressing 'v' to see attachment and than with enter I can > > > > read his message. What I noticed with this process is that > > > > Michael's messages has only one attachment: > > > > I 1 <no description> [text/plain, 7bit, 1.3K] > > > > but all other signed emails has two attachments: > > > > I 1 <no description> [text/plain, quoted, us-ascii, 0.3K] > > > > I 2 Digital signature [applica/pgp-signat, 7bit, 0.2K] > > > > > > > > Could this be the problem? But then I am puzzled why is it only me > > > > who can not read his messages and rest of you can. > > > > > > As far as I can tell, Michael is using 'inline' while most of us are > > > using 'mime'. Could you post your muttrc? Maybe there's some other > > > option affecting this. BTW, what mutt version are you using? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Andrei > > > > Hm, would me using inline be a problem? I use inline because I remember > > reading that some mailing lists don't allow for any sort of attachment; > > So I opted for the non-attachment version of GPG -- Should I be using > > mime as my default? > > AIUI, pgp-inline is deprecated in favour of pgp-mime; certainly, the > Mutt manual strongly suggests that this is the case. > > Ben I've changed my ~/.muttrc file, does it work now Misko? -- If programmers deserve to be rewarded for creating innovative programs, by the same token they deserve to be punished if they restrict the use of these programs. - Richard Stallman
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature