Re: [OT] The record industry, RIAA and US law
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 05:42:19PM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Something wrong there. The welfare benefit should be less than the
> minimum hourly wage. Can't blame anyone there, hell would you choose to
> not work for more money or working for less? Are you sure you have that
> right?
AFAIU some countries implement a system where the welfare is a
percentage of your former wage. I think Romania does the same, but I'm
not sure
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: [OT] The record industry, RIAA and US law
- From: Celejar <celejar@gmail.com>
- Re: [OT] The record industry, RIAA and US law
- From: Amy Templeton <amy.g.templeton@gmail.com>
- Re: [OT] The record industry, RIAA and US law
- From: Celejar <celejar@gmail.com>
- Re: [OT] The record industry, RIAA and US law
- From: Johannes Wiedersich <johannes@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de>
- Re: [OT] The record industry, RIAA and US law
- From: Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl>
- Re: [OT] The record industry, RIAA and US law
- From: Celejar <celejar@gmail.com>
- Re: [OT] The record industry, RIAA and US law
- From: Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl>
- Re: [OT] The record industry, RIAA and US law
- From: Celejar <celejar@gmail.com>
- Re: [OT] The record industry, RIAA and US law
- From: Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl>
- Re: [OT] The record industry, RIAA and US law
- From: mockingbird@earthlight.co.nz (Chris Bannister)