[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: update messages



On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 07:31:04PM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 17:37 +0000, Digby Tarvin wrote:
> > Here is what it says:
> [...]
> >  Maintainer: Fabian Greffrath <fabian@debian-unofficial.org>
> 
> That says it all, doesn't it?

Afraid the name doesn't mean anything to me. 

> > I have tried google, and whilest I have found the same deb package
> > that I have (or derivatives) elsewhere, I haven't found any explanation
> > as to why its gone - though I did find one site mirroring it because
> > 'debian hates XV'...??
> 
> Didn't you see my link to the bug report about the removal, in an
> earlier message in the thread?

Sorry, couldn't find the message you are referring to - was it posted under
the same name? All I can find other than the the one I am replying to
is
   8113 OsL 12/28 [ 0] Sven Arvidsson  (1.8K) Re: installing java (for limewire)
   8142 OsL 12/28 [ 0] Sven Arvidsson  (2.0K) Re: installing java (for limewire)
   8212 OsL 12/29 [ 0] Sven Arvidsson  (0.9K) Re: installing java (for limewire)
   8271 OsL 12/29 [ 0] Sven Arvidsson  (2.9K) Re: bridging eth1 to eth0
   8405 NsL 12/31 [ 0] Sven Arvidsson  (0.9K) Re: /dev/dsp missing
   8406 NsL 12/31 [ 0] Sven Arvidsson  (1.6K) Re: Looking for music player softw
   8414 NsL 12/31 [ 0] Sven Arvidsson  (1.6K) Re: Looking for music player softw

Is there a history file/database somewhere where additions and
removals from the official debian package repository are logged?
Something which came back with 'removed on such and such a date
for such and such a reason' would be so much more useful than
a database which only mentioned packages that still existed.

After all, if there is a philosophical objection to a package on
some ground, removing it makes a much stronger statement if people
know why it isn't there.

Regards,
DigbyT
-- 
Digby R. S. Tarvin                                          digbyt(at)digbyt.com
http://www.digbyt.com



Reply to: