Re: 1 CPU or 2 ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/18/06 20:04, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:02:37PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> There's Xen. And VMware.
>>
>> VMware has been around for years, and is a known, rock-solid
>> hypervisor.
>>
> Actually, I believe that Xen is a virtualizer. Or do they have
> different approaches for their workstation and server products?
"Generic" Xen is a paravirtualizer.
Xen 3.0.2+ on modern Intel and AMD CPUs allows for hardware
virtualization. The technology code names are Vanderpool and Pacifica.
>>> Either way, the more cores the better when the issue is
>>> throughput like a server rather than computation like a gaming
>>> machine.
>> And bandwidth. No use having lots of cores if they are starved for
>> data.
>>
> Good point. Not just that, though, but reliable bandwidth. No sense
> having lots of bandwidth if it is unreliable.
????
Who makes unreliable server-class hardware anymore?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD4DBQFFNta9S9HxQb37XmcRAlaGAJdgL+ox9A9LyeNoLQ0aJPIQJ9V3AKCZ7F90
Jxv45Zx7K9BJKDk82isL4g==
=rdF0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: