Re: laser printer recommendation for personal use?
Arafangion <arafangion@fussycoder.id.au> writes:
> The lexmark printers appear to be better designed for recycling and are
> cheaper - albit at marginally worse print quality. (Both printers
> are very poor quality, so this makes little difference).
Er, are there any popular choices that have _good_ print quality?
[My only experience with printers is those at work, which tend to be
very high quality, though I assume they're pretty expensive too.]
-Miles
--
I'd rather be consing.
Reply to: