Re: gcc-4.1

[CaT <cat@zip.com.au>]

On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:58:49AM -0400, H.S. wrote:
> Others have given you good replies. I would add that do not name your 
> output file (the executable) as "test". A "test" command already exists 
> in Linux.

I don't believe it matters much. Only the crazy and the inept have . in
their $PATH and it's not in there by default. If he has put it in there
then well, it's a good way to learn I guess. :)

-- 
    "To the extent that we overreact, we proffer the terrorists the
    greatest tribute."
    	- High Court Judge Michael Kirby