Re: the ds in GLibC?

To: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@familiasanchez.net>, debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: the ds in GLibC?
From: "Tshepang Lekhonkhobe" <tshepang@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:23:34 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 857993970608292223h1df7013r55497ebfddb046e9@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060829022242.GF17674@miami.connexer.com>
References: <[🔎] 857993970608280932k43ba3bex9be4f27ba6e7f000@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20060829022242.GF17674@miami.connexer.com>

On 8/29/06, Roberto C. Sanchez <roberto@familiasanchez.net> wrote:

On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:32:44PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
> Anyone know what the 'ds' in versions of recent GLibC in unstable mean?
>
Daniel Stone.  I believe he incorporates some significant patches and
wants to differentiate between his customized version and the upstream
version upon which it is based.


But I don't see Daniel's name on the changelog. Are you mistaken?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: the ds in GLibC?
  - From: James Westby <jw+debian@jameswestby.net>

References:
- the ds in GLibC?
  - From: "Tshepang Lekhonkhobe" <tshepang@gmail.com>
- Re: the ds in GLibC?
  - From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@familiasanchez.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Email programs that work.
Next by Date: Re: Email programs that work.
Previous by thread: Re: the ds in GLibC?
Next by thread: Re: the ds in GLibC?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread