RE: Replying to list
Le vendredi 23 juin 2006 à 09:48 -0500, Seth Goodman a écrit :
> > > I'd say it's quite a stretch to say that Elm is at the forefront
> > > of MUA technology.
> >
> > But who was talking elm? Last I checked we had references to
> > mutt and Thunderbird. Both of which do innovative things with mail
> > and both of which, admittedly, have serious warts.
>
> Here was the reference to my old friend Elm earlier in this thread:
> On Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:21 AM -0500, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>
> > I suppose the reason is:
> > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> Here's the piece of that article that got me going:
>
> "
> Any reasonable, modern mailer provides this feature. I prefer the Elm
> mailer. It has separate "r)eply" and "g)roup-reply" commands. If I want
> to reply to the author of a message, I strike the "r" key. If I want to
> send a reply to the entire list, I hit "g" instead. Piece 'o cake.
The version of this file currently online is 4 year old, and the text
may be still older. Besides, the author is just stating what he uses
personally, and the first sentence is very important (and true):
"Any reasonable, modern mailer provides this feature."
T.
Reply to: